Search

Dan Slaton

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
78 matches · 41W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
10%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 3.0
5 of 10
WA · 3.0
427 of 755

Dan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dan has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dan has gone from the 37th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 53% of games
6.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 50.2% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
Vasu Rangaswami / Mikel Morrow
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Rayburn
+0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Manny McBride / Tony Tzeng
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Rayburn
0.030below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
John Manning / David Howell
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Rayburn
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Vijay Dasari / Paul Moosman
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Dillard
0.045below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Tom Dillard / Shahid Rashid
2025-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bryson Huie
0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Zachary Fu / Ales Novak
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arthur Nakata
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
James Hunter / Hunter Wessells
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Arthur Nakata
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Candee Foss / James Chandlerchamps
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · with Sally Linebarger
0.005about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Stephen Dame / Kim Careymixed
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARILYN PORTER
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 32% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Robert Richard / Suzie Heidmixed
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Dubuque
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Xiaohu Liu / Jeremy Collins
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabriel Perez
+0.030better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blake Pedersen
+0.056better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.