← Search

Daisy Cullop

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 63W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daisy Cullop to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
W
2026-07-24 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Hardie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Hinshaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-05 · TCSP-Love All-Cullop · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlos Apacible mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Treasa Sweek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Salvadalena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Treasa Sweek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Salvadalena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Salvadalena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-06 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-20 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-14 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arlene Flor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-23 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marni Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.4%
31W–26L · 49.6% of games
3.5
25.6%
11W–32L · 39.9% of games
6.0mixed
40%
12W–18L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
29.2%
7W–17L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova