Search

Arlene Flor

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
109 matches · 58W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
122 of 144
WA · 3.0
600 of 755

Arlene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Arlene has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Arlene has gone from the 80th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
57.8%
52W–38L · 55% of games
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
L
Elizabeth Parker / Alexia Cosatto
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arden Hofler
0.078below expectation — took 14% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Connie Elim / Vanessa Yang
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arden Hofler
+0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Sarah Parrilla / Monika Sharma
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Fix
0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Kat Korab / Kirsten Daniels
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Elliott
0.034below expectation — took 38% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Lisa Vincent / Michelle Warren
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arden Hofler
0.022below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Xiaohe Hao / Xian Wang
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hawk
0.031below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Zeran Wang / Katherine Xu
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Hawk
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Valeriia Zaychenko / Sara Molina
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Johansen
0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Cheryl Borgonia / Rebecca Zimmer
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Johansen
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Alicia Alberg / Anne Gravrock
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arden Hofler
0.041below expectation — took 43% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Tingting Zheng / Seungwon Lee
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arden Hofler
+0.036better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jamie Johnson / Jennifer Brown
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Fix
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.