Search

Erin Hawk

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
114 matches · 63W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
50%
stay 3.0
50%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 85% stay · 15% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.00 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
56 of 144
WA · 3.0
249 of 755

Erin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erin has gone from the 36th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
73.4%
47W–17L · 56.4% of games
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
W
Xiaohe Hao / Xian Wang
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arlene Flor
0.031below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Zeran Wang / Katherine Xu
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arlene Flor
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Audrey Nguyen / Erica Jordan
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mansfield
+0.007about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Seiko Kobayashi / Meg Viera
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Livesay
+0.039better than expected — took 63% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mansfield
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Proshat Parsimoghadam / Ann Swiftney
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mansfield
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Becky Jhu / Deirdre O'Connor
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Johnson
0.026below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Bunny Rogan / Julie Dewitt
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Johnson
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colin Simon
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
Nari Benson / Susan Shayegani
2025-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Walther
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mansfield
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Cheryl Borgonia / Andrea Lee
2025-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin McMonigal
+0.008about as expected — took 56% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.