Search

Julie Dewitt

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 75W–23L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
1%
stay 3.0
99%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 22% stay · 78% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Lower than today’s 3.19 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.0
1 of 17
WA · 3.0
33 of 755

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 94th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
77.8%
42W–12L · 62.2% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.9% of games
6.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 63% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Bunny Rogan
+0.031better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Bunny Rogan
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Shannan Murphy-Barlow / Kirsten Rey-Rosachamps
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Bunny Rogan
0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
+0.009better than expected — took 68% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Rebecca Zimmer / Cheryl Borgonia
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
+0.036better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Penny Jay / Elisse Priskila
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
0.036below expectation — took 35% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Laura Borner / Jan Stroh
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
+0.027better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Kathleen Berkeley / Eve Le
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 2-1
L
Alexis Wood / Murphy Mack
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
0.081below expectation — took 33% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Edith Matulka / Sarah Parrillachamps
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · with Bunny Rogan
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Morgan Cunningham / Murphy Mack
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
0.040below expectation — took 57% of games against 70% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Bridget Haba / Betsy Chamberlin
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bunny Rogan
0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.