Search

Betsy Chamberlin

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
52 matches · 12W–40L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
239 of 252
WA · 3.0
1032 of 1107

Betsy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Betsy has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Betsy has gone from the 54th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.2% of games
6.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 36.8% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
Colleen Grobstok / Amy Wang
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzan Chavez
0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Lampman
0.004below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Lampman
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Leider
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Shoshanna Wilbur / Robin Hoover
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzan Chavez
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Marni Mills / Jennifer Baum
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Flora Wilson
0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Sally Linebarger / Karen Larson
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cindy Coakley
+0.036better than expected — took 68% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bonnie Currey
0.007below expectation — took 32% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Heather Murch / Sandra Jerez
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Flora Wilson
+0.025better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Sharon Singh / Margie Starnes
2026-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Flora Wilson
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Haba
+0.019about as expected — took 25% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rosie Mastrandrea
+0.004about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.