Search

Marni Mills

Mukilteo, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
75 matches · 33W–42L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mukilteo · 3.0
6 of 7
WA · 3.0
836 of 960

Marni is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marni has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Marni has gone from the 23rd to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
49.1%
27W–28L · 49.4% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.4% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.3% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
W
Marcia O'Donoghue / Laura Blanchard
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Thompson
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Brandy Nordstrom / Sharon Singh
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Rae Smith
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Christie Vandyke / Naomi O'Leary
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Thompson
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Anuradha Nandagiri / Maryna Kosau
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Thompson
0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Betsy Chamberlin / Flora Wilson
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Baum
+0.032better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Cigdem Mayhew / Shannon Garbaccio
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Hardwick
0.043below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Kaylene Anderson / Karen Hogan
2026-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Thompson
+0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lisa C / Robin Hoover
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raluca Hera
0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Amy Wang / Linda Greenlaw
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Thompson
+0.035better than expected — took 61% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jennifer Carrillo / Tara Moyer
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Jamison
+0.021better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Martin
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Brooks
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.