Search

Melissa Jamison

Edmonds, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
105 matches · 41W–64L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.61
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
9%
stay 2.5
91%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 51% stay · 49% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.50. Lower than today’s 2.61 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
25 of 81

Melissa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has been 2.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.02.5202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Melissa has gone from the 16th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
38.5%
15W–24L · 46.1% of games
3.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 47.6% of games
5.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
34.8%
8W–15L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Willem Mager
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Luis Enriquez / Teresa Martinezmixed
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Willem Mager
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Catherine Nielsen / Ian Sweetmixed
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aaron Young
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Shana Perrina / Julie Skerritt
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Motomi Kudo-King
+0.059better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Motomi Kudo-King
0.014about as expected — took 57% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Debbie Lo / Maya Arias
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bierlink
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Heather Thorne / Lynn Carr
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bierlink
+0.042better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Carla Coombs / Lissa Ongman
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vanessa Stedman
0.037below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
5-7, 7-5
W
Julianna Hofmann / Sibylle Brown
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Motomi Kudo-King
+0.024better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jennifer Carrillo / Tara Moyer
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marni Mills
+0.043better than expected — took 59% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Rachel Wang / Lana Dunsmore
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Donna Rigas / Lynne Pogue
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rebecca Brittle
0.063below expectation — took 25% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.