← Search

Ian Sweet

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 25W–29L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Ian Sweet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MI-Quantum Entanglement-Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minori Yoshioka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Minori Yoshioka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · MI-Unforced Terrors Redux-Shankaran · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Minori Yoshioka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · MI-Unforced Terrors Redux-Shankaran · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brandy Nordstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · MI-Unforced Terrors Redux-Shankaran · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Nielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · MI-Unforced Terrors Redux-Shankaran · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Nielsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-05 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Goode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Tzeng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Tzeng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · MI-Wolfe · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tony Tzeng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-08 · MI-Wolfe · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michiel Versteeg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · MI-Serving Fear-Hykes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 70.5% of games
3.5
11.5%
3W–23L · 38% of games
6.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 62.3% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal