← Search

Kevin Peck

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
82 matches · 32W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
13%
down to 3.0
87%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Higher than today’s 3.09 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
61 of 63
WA · 3.5
1124 of 1209

Kevin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kevin has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kevin has gone from the 73rd to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 51.7% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
6W–21L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ian Sweet
−0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Hung Nguyen / James Manzano
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Tzeng
−0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Steve Wong / Ryan Park
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ian Sweet
−0.046below expectation — took 8% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Hykes
−0.025below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Scott Mathews / Robert Sciranko
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
−0.011below expectation — took 42% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Vaidy Krishnan / Jianqing Zhao
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Mattox
+0.050better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sanjiv Parikh
−0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Bove
+0.044better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jaskaran Singh / Tyler Yezman
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjiv Parikh
−0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
James Thomas / Jonathan Burks
2025-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
−0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-02-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjiv Parikh
+0.021better than expected — took 58% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 5-5
W
Kenn Wildes / Paul Cabellon
2025-02-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjiv Parikh
+0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.