← Search

Bradford Gliner

Sammamish, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 95W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bradford Gliner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
L
2026-08-08 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alina Galan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-25 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seonyoon Ko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · EDG-Mavericks-Gliner · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shauna Forster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · EDG-Alcohooligans 3.5-Cook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-24 · EDG-Alcohooligans 3.5-Cook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajive Kilambi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · EDG-Alcohooligans 3.5-Cook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · EDG-Alcohooligans 3.5-Cook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-03-14 · EDG-Net Profits-Cook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajive Kilambi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · EDG-Net Profits-Cook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Ketefian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-30 · EDG-Net Profits-Cook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
15W–0L · 73.7% of games
3.5
49.2%
31W–32L · 50% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
40%
16W–24L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
46%
23W–27L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
57 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal