Search

Bradford Gliner

Sammamish, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
187 matches · 95W–92L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 3.5
30 of 40
WA · 3.5
837 of 1209

Bradford is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bradford has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Bradford has gone from the 30th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
15W–0L · 73.7% of games
3.5
49.2%
31W–32L · 50% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
40%
16W–24L · 49.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.9%
23W–26L · 48.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Gardner
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seonyoon Ko
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Gina Gentry / Carl Ngmixed
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Gardner
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shauna Forster
+0.000about as expected — took 46% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Cung
0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Sai Muppa / Chitradeep Barman
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajive Kilambi
0.018about as expected — took 60% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Filip Bedjovski / Mihai Petriuc
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hansen
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Om Ravi / Krishna Addepalli
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Dickson
+0.002about as expected — took 54% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Sean McCarron / Diego Basantes
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajive Kilambi
+0.018better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Blake Pedersen / Eugene Guber
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Ketefian
0.014below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Mihai Petriuc / Ioan Smintina
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Dickson
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Ted Schneider / Hung Nguyen
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bing Li
+0.058better than expected — took 63% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.