← Search

Kirk Ketefian

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
77 matches · 44W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.29
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
43 of 96
WA · 3.5
603 of 1209

Kirk is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kirk has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kirk has gone from the 40th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.5% of games
3.5
42.6%
20W–27L · 49.3% of games
6.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.013below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Daniel Ellis
2026-05-10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jay Lee / JON COOMBES
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Nolan
−0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Miroslav Doytchev / Maxton Chisepo
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Brown
−0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Cameron Cox
2026-04-11 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Peter Joseph
2026-03-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hansen
+0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Blake Pedersen / Eugene Guber
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradford Gliner
−0.014below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Ethan Chung / Jason Preston
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Brown
+0.035better than expected — took 57% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Noel Le
2026-01-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Wilken
−0.003about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.