Search

Jason Preston

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
49 matches · 25W–24L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
186 of 342
WA · 3.5
741 of 1460

Jason is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jason has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jason has gone from the 54th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
16W–16L · 51.7% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blakely Tsurusaki
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blakely Tsurusaki
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Eli Fahey / Brady Gilroy
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Chung
0.024below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Sarah Yoon / Roy Higashimixed
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Corey Golden
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Ryan Albert / Allen Wu
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Chung
+0.059better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicolas Ludmer
+0.005about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Chung
+0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Andrew Jeong / Beagan Nguy
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Chung
+0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neh Batwara
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Scott Leonardson / Nicholas Toglia
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Sherr
0.014below expectation — took 46% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fadi Ghishan
+0.037better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Dennis van Doorn / Nathan Linden
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ethan Chung
0.015below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.