← Search

PHILIPP SCHMID

Mercer Island, WA
3.5S year-end 2026
56 matches · 16W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
5%
down to 3.0
95%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
67 of 79
WA · 3.5
1124 of 1364

PHILIPP is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

PHILIPP has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, PHILIPP has gone from the 4th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games
3.5
26.2%
11W–31L · 41.4% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
+0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Jason Preston / Neh Batwara
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven DeGracia
−0.029below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Ruochen Wang
2026-04-12 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.071below expectation — took 14% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Atanas Koralski - * / Drake Brodahl
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven DeGracia
−0.012about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2025-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Yetman
−0.009better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Dan Holland / Gabriel Rosenthal
2025-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virl Hill
−0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-02-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharat Maheshwari
−0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Norden
−0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jeff Wise / Jeremy Blanchfield
2023-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharat Maheshwari
−0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-01-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaohui Lou Luo
−0.012below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2023-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjiv Parikh
−0.040below expectation — took 32% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.