Search

Jeremy Blanchfield

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
81 matches · 45W–36L · seasons 20192026
Where Jeremy sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Jeremy is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeremy has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jeremy has gone from the 25th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 59.1% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
W
Ben Perkowski / Michael Green
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Koenigsbauer
0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Hendry
+0.010about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Chris Moore / David King
2025-03-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Callaghan
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Larson
0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Schneider
+0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jason Shinn / Loren Callahan
2025-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Johnson
+0.024better than expected — took 47% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Akram Hussein / Matt Neerincx
2024-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Hendry
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Albrecht
0.049below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rob Hendry
+0.006about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-02-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2024-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Hall
+0.054better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Johnson
0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.