← Search

Terrence Seet

Bothell, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 98W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Terrence Seet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Donna Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Donna Kim championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · MC-Soju want some of this?-Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mabel Tang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · MC-Ready Squad-Seet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-5
W
2026-05-09 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · MC-Wolf Pack v2-Hinojosa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Seet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
12W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.5
84.1%
37W–7L · 62.2% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 63% of games
4.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56.8% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 64.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
36 matches
#2 Singles
20%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova