Search

Elise Spencer

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
107 matches · 55W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
18%
stay 3.0
82%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 64% stay · 36% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Lower than today’s 3.07 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
37 of 144
WA · 3.0
141 of 755

Elise is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elise has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Elise has gone from the 36th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
39W–26L · 53.7% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.1% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
L
Mary Czerwinski / Aki Shirahamamixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ross Bunker
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chaz Pangelinan
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Melanie Yon / Kriss Wells
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Bullard
0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Yang-Williams
+0.031better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Catherine Sampson Brooks / Tammy Holliday
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Bullard
+0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Kelly Ambrose / Rachel Malen
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Connolly
0.009about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Bianca Marcu / Jolanta Grigsby
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Wilson
+0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Eloisa Tang / Sara Millerchamps
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Dixon
+0.031better than expected — took 68% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Elisse Priskila / Jude Neldamchamps
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Molly Bullard
+0.027better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Mengye Guo / Giuliana Guilherme
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Bullard
0.014about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 5-2
W
Emily Norden / Brandy Nordstrom
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Dixon
+0.051better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Laurie Wilkins / Debara Ferleman
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Bullard
+0.037better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.