Teams

TCSP-Sharks-Tarte

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs CP-Victorious-BeckerLost 04
L#1 DoublesSarah Duffy / Lisa Hagan vs Mary Jean Waite / Michelle Dauphiny Becker4-6, 4-5
L#1 SinglesKirsten Daniels vs Dina Rogers3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMinda Brusse / Sheila Connolly vs Colleen Grobstok / Dana Laursen1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Dixon / Carrie Morris vs Amy Wang / Katie van Zyl5-7, 6-6
L#1 DoublesMolly Bullard / Kimberly Miller vs Brittany Caldwell / Reese Cowan Stewart5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesCaren Gillespie vs Audrey Wang6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Hagan / Christine Alley Krabak vs Erin Corson / Sara Burgess6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGalen Sherlock / Robin Tarte vs Pranom Leephan-Williams / Rives Kitchell6-7, 6-7
2026-02-13vs NTC-KennedyWon 31
W#1 DoublesMolly Bullard / Sarah Duffy vs Khue Tran / Mary Dwyer6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKimberly Miller vs Sofia Zubiria6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLiesl Langley / Sheila Connolly vs Seow-Ling Chua / Erin Kennedy3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCarrie Morris / Karen Dixon vs Margaret Stuart / Lesley Burvill Holmes6-3, 6-4
2026-02-08vs BETC-RuthWon 31
W#1 DoublesLisa Hagan / Sheila Connolly vs Carol Markham / Sun-Mi Ruth7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMolly Bullard vs Key Nuqui4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobin Tarte / Christine Alley Krabak vs Yan Mathison / Vicky Dinh6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKimberly Miller / Liesl Langley vs Juliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell6-4, 6-2
2026-02-01vs PSC-High Five-QinWon 40
W#1 DoublesElise Spencer / Molly Bullard vs Mengye Guo / Giuliana Guilherme7-6, 5-2
W#1 SinglesKimberly Miller vs Li Qin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGalen Sherlock / Christine Alley Krabak vs Raluca Hera / Dana Cozmei6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Hagan / Sheila Connolly vs Geanina Andreiu / Jennifer Jensen6-4, 6-3
2026-01-24vs MI-Simply Smashing-NielsenWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Dixon / Elise Spencer vs Emily Norden / Brandy Nordstrom6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCaren Gillespie vs Katrina Wisner6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGalen Sherlock / Robin Tarte vs Connie Manson / Selamawit Engda6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMinda Brusse / Liesl Langley vs Catherine Nielsen / Melissa Saelzer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-11vs RTC-See You In Court-CatzoelaWon 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Duffy / Christine Alley Krabak vs Pallavi Taleppadi / Karen Ng6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKirsten Daniels vs Sana Sfar6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Tarte / Galen Sherlock vs Christina Catzoela / Lisa Collins6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMinda Brusse / Karen Dixon vs Vitida Robinson / Caiping Zang2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-04vs RBW-Group Therapy-EnglishWon 31
W#1 DoublesMolly Bullard / Elise Spencer vs Laurie Wilkins / Debara Ferleman6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKirsten Daniels vs Stephanie Raffetto1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLiesl Langley / Caren Gillespie vs Cristi Rivas / Aasa Holmgren6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKimberly Miller / Robin Tarte vs Ozzy English / Rose Flowers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Sarah Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Molly Bullard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.89
Kimberly Miller
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.88
Galen Sherlock
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Elise Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Karen Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Christine Alley Krabak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Hagan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Sheila Connolly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Robin Tarte
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Kirsten Daniels
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Caren Gillespie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Liesl Langley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Carrie Morris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Minda Brusse
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Galen Sherlock + Sarah Duffy4170% games+19.1% vs expected
Robin Tarte + Galen Sherlock6262% games+9.9% vs expected
Karen Dixon + Elise Spencer4160% games+7.8% vs expected
Elise Spencer + Molly Bullard20459% games+7.1% vs expected
Lisa Hagan + Sarah Duffy3258% games+5.3% vs expected
Karen Dixon + Carrie Morris4159% games+2.5% vs expected
Liesl Langley + Molly Bullard4160% games+2.2% vs expected
Kimberly Miller + Sarah Duffy2353% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah Duffy
33W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Molly Bullard
86W–66L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Kimberly Miller
95W–111L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Galen Sherlock
28W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Elise Spencer
55W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Karen Dixon
70W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Christine Alley Krabak
34W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Lisa Hagan
50W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Sheila Connolly
66W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Robin Tarte
33W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Kirsten Daniels
73W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Caren Gillespie
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Liesl Langley
46W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Carrie Morris
53W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Minda Brusse
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.