← Search

Akram Hussein

Sammamish, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
50 matches · 27W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 3.5
22 of 45
WA · 3.5
746 of 1460

Akram is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Akram has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Akram has gone from the 25th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
54.2%
26W–22L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nan Li
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Ellen Johnson / Damian Gibbsmixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Chen
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jiaofeng Xu
−0.015about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Uday Sangar / Japheth Gonzalez
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zhidong Yang
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arun Thippur
−0.022below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jiaofeng Xu
−0.031below expectation — took 35% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Mien Chi Chen / Justin Pae
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yue Zhao
+0.028better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Rajesh Gatti / Sudhir Raman
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bhargava Vadapalli
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vinay Yerramilli
+0.007about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Alex Coffey / Raghunandan Allepally
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anil Potta
+0.030better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zhidong Yang
+0.009about as expected — took 42% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mengkhy Lay / Timothy Lam
2025-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anil Potta
−0.010about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.