Search

Damian Gibbs

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 45W–21L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
80%
stay 3.0
20%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.0
12 of 39
WA · 3.0
575 of 1529

Damian is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Damian has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Damian has gone from the 42nd to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
64.8%
35W–19L · 52% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Johnson
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Garfield
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Garfield
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Jerry Wei / Tianhui Zhou - (DQ)
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Golphenee
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kesav Kaliyaperumal / Zhentao Lin
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony DiLorenzo
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jonathan Lanterman
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 7-5
W
ANMOL MOHANTY / Sai Gokul Kanakala
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shahid Rashid
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 7-6
W
Tianyu Li
2026-03-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.019better than expected — took 55% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Suryan
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.