← Search

Richard Golphenee

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 37W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Richard Golphenee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-07-26 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Iskra Ivanova mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · BORG IV · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Philip Laue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-4
W
2026-06-21 · BORG IV · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Philip Laue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mona Elsing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · BORG IV · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Philip Laue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · Golphenee · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · BORG IV · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Philip Laue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Margoles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Golphenee · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Jerry Wei / Tianhui Zhou - (DQ)
2026-05-16 · HBSQ-Net Ninjas-Gibbs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Damian Gibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · HBSQ-Net Ninjas-Gibbs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · Golphenee · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
69.4%
34W–15L · 55.4% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#1 Singles
24%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova