Search

David Douglas

CAMAS, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
76 matches · 29W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
5%
down to 3.0
95%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
1044 of 1209

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, David has gone from the 67th to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
31.8%
14W–30L · 44% of games
7.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 49.2% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
W
Christopher Ma / Arnie Willig
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Heathman
+0.016better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Mak Abulhosn / Christopher Dickinson
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Blasko
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
David Kim / Ryan Lambert
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Coffey
0.005below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Arun Sundaram / Dennis Hidalgo
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Coffey
+0.029about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Coffey
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
David Pogue / RICHARD NELSON
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Young
0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Young
+0.017better than expected — took 100% of games against 76% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Bruce Addison / Kirk Koenigsbauer
2025-09-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Young
0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raghunandan Allepally
+0.003about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Henry Kiner / Ben Broder
2025-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Altchech
0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Siyami Avci / Bao Trinh
2025-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Heathman
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Young
0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.