← Search

Vanessa Stedman

Edmonds, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 18W–44L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Vanessa Stedman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-07-15 · Team LAVA · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ai Holwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Team LAVA · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alashia Wartelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · HBSQ-Leiser 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alashia Wartelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Leiser 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-13 · HBSQ-Leiser 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · HBSQ-Leiser 2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alashia Wartelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · HBSQ-Leiser 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alashia Wartelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-30 · HBSQ-Leiser 2.5W · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-23 · HBSQ-Leiser 2.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ai Holwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · HBSQ-Wartelle · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melissa Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5
W
2026-02-08 · HBSQ-Wartelle · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · HBSQ-Wartelle · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
33.3%
16W–32L · 40.5% of games
3.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 21.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams