Search

Willem Mager

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
104 matches · 59W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
14%
stay 3.0
86%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 59% stay · 41% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.09 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.0
2 of 17
WA · 3.0
119 of 755

Willem is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Willem has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Willem has gone from the 77th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.5% of games
3.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.8% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.4% of games
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 59.2% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history104 matches
W
Mark Enstrom / Shelly Enstrommixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Jamison
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Luis Enriquez / Teresa Martinezmixed
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Jamison
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
John Xu / Ken Duffie
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
0.019about as expected — took 60% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Derek Coley / Soma Burela
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Jahnke
0.044below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Anirudha Desai / Seif Talat
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Abernathy
0.060below expectation — took 37% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
Abhishek Goswami / Robert Holmgren
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stanley Cernosek
0.009about as expected — took 43% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Drake Brodahl / Stephen Meyles
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Mcdowell
0.009below expectation — took 37% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Cesar Castaneda / Rich Zhu
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
0.022below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Michael Cotta / Eric Stoll
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Abernathy
0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Raj Rajasekar / Thomas Walker
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Gettmann
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Seif Talat / Soon Kwon
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
+0.005better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Mark Litton / Stephen Daniel
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Serwold
+0.005about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.