← Search

Stanley Cernosek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 10W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history44 matches
W
2026-10-31 · HBSQ-Rich · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Mcdowell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · HBSQ-Rich · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas O'Rourke
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-20 · HBSQ-Rich · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Gettmann
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-23 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Kennelly
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keith Abernathy
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-10 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Willem Mager
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-11 · Harbor Square Stan · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-07 · Harbor Square Stan · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-02 · HBSQ-The Other Guys-Chapman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Tameishi
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 37% of games
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 41.9% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova