Search

William Razeto

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
103 matches · 50W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.81. Lower than today’s 2.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
107 of 144
WA · 3.0
494 of 755

William is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

William has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, William has gone from the 51st to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.8% of games
6.0
52.8%
28W–25L · 51.1% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 38% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
Kenneth Kodama / Steve Suzukichamps
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with James Roma
+0.011about as expected — took 46% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Nicholas Sherman / Joseph Mecca
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rayburn
0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Tom Clemente / Thomas Natsis
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Roma
+0.036better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Brad Raynor / Rod Addicott
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Roma
0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
David Bradlee / Howard Choder
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dick Lunceford
+0.028better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Bret O'Rourke / Kim Smith
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rayburn
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Stephen Waltar / Dave Wilner
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mikel Morrow
0.017below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rasanen
0.024below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Wink Thorne / Jeff Mcdowell
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rasanen
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
MICHAEL LYNG / Joseph Mecca
2025-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mikel Morrow
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Rayburn
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 7-5
L
MARK MILLER / Matthew Schwartz
2024-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Roma
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.