← Search

Matthew Schwartz

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 31W–24L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Matthew Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Bates McKee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-09 · NWW-TCSP-Cohn · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Shalinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · NWW-TCSP-Cohn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Cohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Ramji Beera / Marian Stanescu
2025-02-28 · NTC-Morgan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-01-26 · NTC-Morgan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-04 · NTC-Morgan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elliot Broadwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with MARK MILLER championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-11-16 · TCSP-Cohn · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bates McKee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-10-19 · AYTC-String Theory-deGroen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARK MILLER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-10-12 · AYTC-String Theory-deGroen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kenneth Kodama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-10-05 · TCSP-Cohn · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glynn Omoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2024-10-04 · AYTC-String Theory-deGroen · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARK MILLER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.2% of games
6.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 63% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams