← Search

Matthew Schwartz

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
55 matches · 31W–24L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.0
82%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
248 of 256
WA · 3.5
1144 of 1209

Matthew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matthew has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.52020202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Matthew has gone from the 83rd to the 100th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 48.2% of games
6.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 63% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Bates McKee
−0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Howard Shalinsky
−0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Mark Brown / Kenn Wildes
2025-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Cohn
−0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Burns
+0.044better than expected — took 33% of games against 23% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-01-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elliot Broadwin
−0.029below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-12-07 · #1 Doubles · with MARK MILLER
−0.053below expectation — took 35% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
James Hunter / Phil Shigo
2024-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bates McKee
+0.003better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-10-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARK MILLER
−0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Kim Gould / Joseph Lacko
2024-10-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kenneth Kodama
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glynn Omoto
−0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with MARK MILLER
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.