Search

Elliot Broadwin

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
65 matches · 20W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
12%
stay 3.0
88%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 56% stay · 44% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.99. Lower than today’s 3.09 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
30 of 213
WA · 3.0
118 of 960

Elliot is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elliot has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920202021202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Elliot has gone from the 13th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
26.7%
8W–22L · 43.7% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 40.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David King
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mohamed Azdamou
0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David King
+0.002below expectation — took 28% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Rottler
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Hilario Koyama / Ji Zhang
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mohamed Azdamou
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Ben Smith / Miguel Beltran
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Kniffin
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marshall Longtin
+0.019better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marshall Longtin
+0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Brian MacDuff / Bates McKee
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefan Cobb
0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marshall Longtin
+0.015better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
David Gartenberg / Kenn Wildes
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Carow
+0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Eckmann
0.036below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.