← Search

Scott Schlumberger

Kenmore, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 59W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Schlumberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-03-14 · HBSQ-The Hammers-Aizawa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Villiott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · HBSQ-The Hammers-Aizawa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Max Genereaux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-01-04 · HBSQ-The Hammers-Aizawa · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lynagh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · HBSQ-Garfield · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-11-08 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Bjorge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-10-18 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gordon Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Matthew Aalfs / Michael Ford
2025-10-05 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Willem Mager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-09-13 · HBSQ-Garfield · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-10 · HBSQ-Furman 55 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mandi Counter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-08-02 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mandi Counter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-22 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mandi Counter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-03-15 · HBSQ-Hammers-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Duane Hauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.9% of games
3.5
70%
21W–9L · 54.5% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
7.0
68%
17W–8L · 60.5% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.5% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer