Search

Jonathan White

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
56 matches · 30W–26L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
4%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
90 of 256
WA · 3.5
381 of 1209

Jonathan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jonathan has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jonathan has gone from the 53rd to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
54.9%
28W–23L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
Jason Young / Alan Pugh
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Cobb
0.012below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Christopher Ma / Keith Shattuck
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Patrick Donovan
2026-05-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.061below expectation — took 50% of games against 68% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Troy Brown / Roy Higashi
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hanses
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
+0.018better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Tipu Qureshi / Mark Villiott
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jesse Jochinsen
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Joe van Zyl / Luke Burtis
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
+0.022better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Scott Schlumberger / Matthew Villiott
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hanses
+0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jason Smith / David King
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
+0.046better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
+0.015about as expected — took 40% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Rong Qiang Xu / Tian Li
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hanses
0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Stoneberg
0.032below expectation — took 43% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.