← Search

Stefan Cobb

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Vernon, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 8W–17L · seasons 2021–2025

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026 and 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history25 matches
L
2025-10-17 · NTC-String Theory-Morgan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colin Williams
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-11 · NTC-String Theory-Morgan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elliot Broadwin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-05 · NTC-String Theory-Morgan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Saeid Ghassaei
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-28 · NTC-Morgan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Eckmann
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-02-22 · NTC-Morgan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elliot Broadwin
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-21 · NTC-Morgan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefan Cobb - *
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-11-04 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andy Rottler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-15 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Cobb
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-10-01 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Dunnington
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2023-03-17 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jacobsen
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-25 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-2
L
2023-01-08 · NTC-String Theory-Burns · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jacobsen
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 45% of games
7.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#1 Singles
16%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer