← Search

Mike Miller

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 27W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Mike Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Bethlyn Whitney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bethlyn Whitney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bethlyn Whitney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-03 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bethlyn Whitney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bethlyn Whitney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bethlyn Whitney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Willem Mager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stanley Cernosek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stanley Cernosek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-21 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Willem Mager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Mcdowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-01-17 · HBSQ-Abernathy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Willem Mager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 46.9% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 69% of the time
#1 Doubles
69%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe