← Search

Stephen Meyles

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 71W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Stephen Meyles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-08-07 · CP-Terminators 7.0-Qi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Qi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · CP-Terminators 7.0-Qi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Qi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-03 · CP-Terminators 7.0-Qi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Qi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Baird championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Baird championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Baird championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Baird championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Meyles-Flex · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Liang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-29 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marshall Winget
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · CP-EagleFang-Fields · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jayden Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · Meyles-Flex · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 64.4% of games
3.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 60.5% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.7% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 63.2% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
84%
21W–4L · 61.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
18%
19 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova