Search

Jason Liang

REDMOND, WA
3.5A year-end 2025
162 matches · 90W–72L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
REDMOND · 3.5
5 of 7
WA · 3.5
848 of 1209

Jason is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jason has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jason has gone from the 30th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 58.6% of games
3.5
34.5%
19W–36L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.5% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-07-11 · CP-Terminators 7.0-Qi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wenjin Li
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Meyles
0.023below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Kurt Schulz
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Marc Chatalas / Peter Larsen
2026-05-08 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Flaviano Villa-real
0.056below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 4-4
W
Alexis Garcia
2026-04-19 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.072better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Yao Yao / Yang Yue
2026-04-11 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Flaviano Villa-real
0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · CP-AC/CP-Thunderstruck-Meyles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Flaviano Villa-real
+0.050better than expected — took 67% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Jeffrey Lee
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.146better than expected — took 86% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Matt Topping / Blake Pedersen
2026-03-15 · CP-Liu · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Meyles
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Gregory Snow / Dana Young
2026-03-14 · CP-Liu · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Liu
+0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.