← Search

Kathryn Strecker

Woodway, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 39W–42L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kathryn Strecker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-11 · HBSQ-Classic Hits-Matysik · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anna Matysik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-14 · HBSQ-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Patricia Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-03 · HBSQ-Thompson · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Maurene Cronyn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Diane Erickson / Jill Snyder
2026-06-08 · HBSQ-Tierney · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · HBSQ-Tierney · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-29 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · HBSQ-Leiser · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Spalding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · HBSQ-Leiser · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-31 · HBSQ-Leiser · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · HBSQ-Classic Hits-Matysik/Swingle · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games
3.0
28.2%
11W–28L · 42.7% of games
6.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer