← Search

Rebecca Clements

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
145 matches · 57W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
188 of 256
WA · 3.5
814 of 1209

Rebecca is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rebecca has gone from the 21st to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
44.1%
41W–52L · 49.1% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.4% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
4W–16L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nicholson
+0.044better than expected — took 55% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deb Holbrook
+0.056better than expected — took 100% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Shirley Chow / Douglas Beckmixed
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeremy Jones
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Felix Acuna
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Alice Lee / Salome Koloffon Tella
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Diaw
+0.034better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jennifer Grant / Karolina Maciag
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Diaw
+0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Diaw
+0.015about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawli Hathaway
−0.019below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Diaw
+0.012about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Mee Lee / Bianca Marcu
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deb Holbrook
−0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Sharon Lee / Suanty Kaghan
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Ishado
+0.036better than expected — took 45% of games against 33% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Yumi Ahn / Michiyo Killeen
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Howe
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.