← Search

Kim Smallwood

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 32W–59L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kim Smallwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-09-13 · BC-Vintage-Webber Meeks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Coakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
L
2026-03-28 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Nissen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-17 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Lowes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-11 · BC-Happy Spicy-Park · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · BC-Vintage-WebberMeeks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-01 · BC-Vintage-WebberMeeks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-10-26 · BC-Vintage-WebberMeeks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-19 · BC-Gerard/Birch · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
36.2%
21W–37L · 44% of games
7.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova