Search

Kim Smallwood

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
90 matches · 32W–58L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
9%
down to 3.0
91%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
82 of 96
WA · 3.5
1082 of 1209

Kim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kim has gone from the 26th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
36.2%
21W–37L · 44% of games
7.0
32%
8W–17L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
Chandra Pandey / Mary Jean Waite
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Coakley
0.019below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
May-Jun Chao / Samantha Hyres
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
+0.005about as expected — took 42% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 5-5
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Nissen
0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Lowes
0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
0.025below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kate Kennedy / Kristen Mosebar
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
+0.015better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Anne Holland / Kara Palmer
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
+0.020better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tricie Hunter
0.032below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hasbrook
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricie Hunter
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.