Search

Priscilla Yow

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
99 matches · 56W–43L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
70 of 96
WA · 3.5
916 of 1209

Priscilla is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Priscilla has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Priscilla has gone from the 39th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 69.9% of games
3.5
50%
20W–20L · 50.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.5% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
L
J Coifman / Suzanne Vogt
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Medilyn Barrett
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Marian Joh / Rachel Smith
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Franco
0.023below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Nari Benson / Rosa Wu
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Graves
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Asha DSouza / Deanne Bilsborough
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandeep Cherra
0.022about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Katrina Spade / Katie Busby
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Min Park
+0.030better than expected — took 65% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-05 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.017below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Courtney Williams / Erin Coomerchamps
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Chu
0.029below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Franco
0.036below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Karen Rice / Julie Naus
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Chu
0.009about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karla Franco
0.045below expectation — took 60% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Min Park
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.