← Search

Terri Smith

BELLEVUE, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
279 matches · 176W–103L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Terri Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history279 matches
L
2026-09-12 · NTC-55 Shades of Grit-Wickham · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · PL-Escalona M55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Srish Sawkar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · BETC-Shutt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Nakata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · BETC-Shutt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Nakata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-08-02 · PL-Escalona M55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Lamoria mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · PL-Escalona M55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gaylord Escalona mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · BETC-Shutt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Nakata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · BETC-Shutt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arthur Nakata mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · PL-Escalona M55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gaylord Escalona mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
86.6%
58W–9L · 62.8% of games
4.0
42.2%
38W–52L · 46.2% of games
7.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 61.7% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
74.4%
29W–10L · 55.5% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
41 matches
#1 Singles
8%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe