← Search

Ray Hisayasu

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
155 matches · 54W–101L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
69%
stay 3.0
31%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
18 of 31
WA · 3.0
319 of 755

Ray is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ray has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Ray has gone from the 58th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
29.2%
14W–34L · 39.9% of games
6.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 50.8% of games
7.0
36.8%
14W–24L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
20.7%
6W–23L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emiko Way
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Tom Pigott / Craig Swansonchamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Mike Gilkey
−0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Steve Fields / Frank Dorr
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Galen Wickstrom
+0.037better than expected — took 92% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Robert Fish / Roy Higashi
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mike Gilkey
+0.058better than expected — took 59% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Terry Coe / RICHARD NELSON
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carter Hicks
−0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Anu Goel / Mike Andersonchamps
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Carter Hicks
−0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Douglas Mclennan / Jeffry Borgida
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carter Hicks
−0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Scott Miller / Richard Seges
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carter Hicks
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Christopher Glassmoyer / Robert Bengford
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with JOHN GLOVER
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Lawrence
+0.004below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hank Chin
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jonathan Brown / Scott Lennard
2025-09-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Bennett
+0.019about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.