Search

Jeffry Borgida

Monroe, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
97 matches · 32W–65L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.59
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
12%
down to 2.5
88%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 8% down · 92% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.61. Higher than today’s 2.59 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
937 of 960

Jeffry is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeffry has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jeffry has gone from the 19th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
32.1%
18W–38L · 43.3% of games
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.8% of games
6.0mixed
31.4%
11W–24L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history97 matches
L
Zhe Yang / Dechuan Zhuang
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandeep Andre
0.069below expectation — took 0% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Sanjay Chopra / John Haines
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Beals
0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Silviu Guea / William Miao
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Dan Feng / Craig Ruden
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Beals
+0.033better than expected — took 41% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandeep Andre
0.037below expectation — took 40% of games against 59% expected
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Abtin Amini / William Bunker
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Mark Chen / Joon Yang
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Aleksanyan
+0.044better than expected — took 29% of games against 21% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Carter Hicks / Ray Hisayasu
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglas Mclennan
+0.013about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Adam Hasson / Douglas Lane
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wayne Stoll
+0.038better than expected — took 60% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Martin
+0.087better than expected — took 100% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jonathan Dong / Soon Kwon
2025-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanjay Chopra
0.008below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas O'Rourke
0.053below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.