← Search

Craig Ruden

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 27W–30L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Craig Ruden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-07-18 · CP-Party Mixers-Edmonds · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Galanes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · CP-Party Mixers-Edmonds · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · CP-Party Mixers-Edmonds · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Kamyar Moinzadeh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · CP-EagleFang-Fields · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Savas Parastatidis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-08 · CP-EagleFang-Fields · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Savas Parastatidis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · CP-EagleFang-Fields · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Savas Parastatidis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · CP-Legends-von Gortler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-06 · CP-EagleFang-Meyles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Prakash Kondepudi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-08 · CP-EagleFang-Meyles · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Prakash Kondepudi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-01-31 · CP-EagleFang-Meyles · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Feng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-12-11 · #1 Doubles · with Chrissy Bauer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.2% of games
3.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 42% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
60%
6W–4L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer