Search

Michael Beals

Everett, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
101 matches · 33W–68L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Everett · 3.0
8 of 9
WA · 3.0
683 of 755

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michael has gone from the 5th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
28%
14W–36L · 42.6% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
37.8%
14W–23L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Belinda Buscher / Chester Weirmixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Lai
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Bruce Jahnke / Diane Daggattmixed
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Lai
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Daniel Warren / Rodrigo Gonzalez
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Satya Vangala
+0.022about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Yujunrong Ma / Zan Fu
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Satya Vangala
0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Julio Mendez / Alejandro Vega
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Stark
+0.015better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Shane Coulter / Troy Johnson
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Stark
0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Sanjay Chopra / John Haines
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffry Borgida
0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Mark Moskal / Jason Schroeder
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandeep Andre
+0.011about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Dan Feng / Craig Ruden
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeffry Borgida
+0.030better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Dion Hutchings / Andrew Pollack
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Stark
+0.016better than expected — took 68% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Harry Wang / Henry Osias
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sean McCarron
0.040below expectation — took 42% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Seif Talat / Anirudha Desai
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Smith
+0.033better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.