Search

Erin Park

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
105 matches · 42W–63L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
37%
stay 3.0
63%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 78% stay · 22% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
17 of 82
WA · 3.0
220 of 960

Erin is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erin has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Erin has gone from the 2nd to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 49.2% of games
3.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 43.6% of games
3.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 34.8% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history105 matches
W
Veena Shankaran / Drew Baldwinmixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Sung
+0.000below expectation — took 57% of games against 65% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Amy Taylor / Craig Rudenmixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Sung
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Tammi Tompkins / Lucio Tiberimixed
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Sung
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Robert Shen / Juiling Edmondsmixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Sung
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Julia Pascualy / Amy Friedland
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Haba
+0.049better than expected — took 56% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jingjing Cai
+0.003about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Hyemin Jeon / Leilani Caldwell
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Dunsmore
+0.016about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Elizabeth Graves / Helen Wang
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Haba
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Anna Karlin / Hien Nguyen
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Gerard
+0.018about as expected — took 20% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Andrea Ng / Jessie Drakulich
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Haba
0.005below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Hsu
0.066below expectation — took 25% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Haba
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.