← Search

Scott Nagel

Newcastle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 36W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Nagel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-09 · EDG-Wood · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Dickman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · EDG-Wood · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Dickman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · EDG-Wood · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Dickman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · EDG-Golden Grand Slammers-Keller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Schelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-03 · EDG-Golden Grand Slammers-Keller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Strand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-14 · EDG-Golden Grand Slammers-Keller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-09-05 · EDG-Golden Grand Slammers-Keller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-11 · EDG-Bobcats-Huang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Wilken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-03 · EDG-Bobcats-Huang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Wilken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-10-19 · EDG-Heavy Hitters-Keller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Cung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-10-13 · EDG-Heavy Hitters-Keller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-09-27 · EDG-Heavy Hitters-Keller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Cung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
54.5%
18W–15L · 49.5% of games
7.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer