← Search

Kenny Kramer

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 85W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kenny Kramer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Hal Blumberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Sampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · HBSQ-Adee · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Blumberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-06 · HBSQ-Adee · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hal Blumberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-01 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-18 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Huang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-05 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Lorring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-27 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Liner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-09-21 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-06 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-09-05 · HBSQ-Hammers-Poletti · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Lorring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.7%
42W–20L · 54.5% of games
7.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 56.1% of games
8.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert