Search

Jim Tjelle

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
128 matches · 68W–60L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
47%
down to 3.5
53%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 28% down · 72% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.55. Higher than today’s 3.51 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 4.0
72 of 76
WA · 4.0
711 of 782

Jim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jim has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jim has gone from the 38th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
57.4%
31W–23L · 51.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
8.0
50%
17W–17L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ying-Fang Lai
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
William Chapman / Charles Naden
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikel Morrow
0.042below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikel Morrow
0.013below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laine Tsujii
0.063below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Robertson
+0.034better than expected — took 68% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Steve Ikeda / Mark Weiser
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikel Morrow
0.017about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Robert Bennett / Howard Shalinsky
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikel Morrow
+0.012better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Moreland / David Sharpe
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Zinck
+0.020better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Joe Bilsborough / Jeff Chaney
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Ng
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Loh
0.099about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
James Hoesly / Kitt Hawkinschamps
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · with Dennis Salveson
+0.000about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.