← Search

Joe Bilsborough

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 74W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joe Bilsborough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Deanne Bilsborough championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Rohit Sharma / Racquel Johnson
2026-08-02 · BC-Vegarra · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · BC-Vegarra · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allyson Marks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · BC-Match Point-McCullough · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Asha DSouza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · BC-Match Point-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deanne Bilsborough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · M & Joe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Murali Musturnagarajan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · BC-Match Point-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deanne Bilsborough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · BC-Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · BC-Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kwang Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · BC-Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brant Lyerla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · BC-Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Griff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · BC-M 7.0-Seeley · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luke Bienfang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 57.5% of games
4.0
30.2%
13W–30L · 44.4% of games
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.8% of games
8.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams