← Search

Ken Wong

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
50 matches · 34W–16L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
44 of 199
WA · 4.0
170 of 840

Ken is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ken has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ken has gone from the 92nd to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
76.3%
29W–9L · 58.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravi Ramkumar
+0.021better than expected — took 54% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Marc Cummings / Russ Bucklin
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ravi Ramkumar
−0.023below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abraham Lee
−0.004about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Bai
−0.004better than expected — took 100% of games against 85% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Thomas Anderson / David Park
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Fong
−0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-5
L
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Lee
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abraham Lee
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Cooper
+0.032better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Chris Bridgeman / Geoff Harrison
2025-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Cooper
+0.040better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gustinis
−0.010about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Daniel Nordale / Tim Tiscornia
2025-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Lee
−0.045below expectation — took 44% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Lee
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.