Search

ISAMU KIBE

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
68 matches · 41W–27L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
59%
down to 3.5
41%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 36% down · 64% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.53. Higher than today’s 3.48 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 4.0
74 of 76
WA · 4.0
734 of 782

ISAMU is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

ISAMU has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, ISAMU has gone from the 93rd to the 98th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
81.5%
22W–5L · 65.5% of games
4.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 39.5% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
L
Seamus Miller / Phillip Nguyen
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Munish Vashist
+0.030about as expected — took 29% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Muhammad Usman Janjua
+0.021better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Deepak Venkateswaran / Ivan Pare Des
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Muhammad Usman Janjua
0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Samuele Carpineti / Shantanu Khemani
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Muhammad Usman Janjua
+0.039better than expected — took 58% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 5-4
W
Eric Steinwinder / Joseph Moore
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Muhammad Usman Janjua
+0.041better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karthik Jayachandran
0.024below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Alejandro Henao / Nathan Frederickson
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Bemis
0.041below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Brian Johnson / Mark Hayter
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russ Holsen
0.056below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Bemis
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Young Han / Kelly Carolus
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Kim-Himmelfarb
+0.029better than expected — took 35% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Yang
0.058below expectation — took 0% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elvis Ochoa
0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.